Target optical

Do you enjoy underdog stories?
Are you that one guy who'd glass cannon AWP in CS:GO?
Do you by any chance enjoy stories about SAS?
Then fear not, the Javelin is for you!
Well, well, well. I never thought PikPok would actually come back around and take the time to make a change about this thing, but here we are folks. I'm impressed. Because I actually enjoy the L96A1, which is essentially one of the two parents to this rifle.
Okay. So you're probably yelling "why in the hell are you talking about some random fish and chips rifle twice" at your screens. Hands up if that's what you did.
Now, the 6 people who actually raised their hands, two things.

1. You're literally obeying a text that is written on the internet. I'm disappointed.
2. There is a major change about the rifle, and it changes its odds of being viable.

​
Let's wind the clock back a little bit. Not too much, but to the times before the latest update.
Javelin used to be the major underdog that was powerful, but tiresome to use. It was slow, hectically cumbersome, and had nothing to offer over its modern cousin, the Cobalt MkIV.
But most importantly, for some reason James would inanely insist on shouldering it so high that the player's peripheral vision would be blocked, by the enormous half-a-mile long scope this rifle had.
And you know what, if the game had a Stand Your Ground mode, I'd be fine by that. It would make sense to have the scope so high up your face, to provide some sense of challenge. Or even make it a functional part of the gun, why not.
But the game is a run-and-gun, and having a tube that doesn't even do its job block your visual on your 1-3 o'clock is just unacceptable, especially in the presence of runners.
Well, back to the future now. What has changed?
Well, what's changed is that scope blocking our right flank. James finally has given up on the idea of trying to shoulder-fire this monstrosity, and now he carries the gun on a much lower position.
This means, the scope is no longer an obstructive instrument that risks your life every time you tried using the rifle. You can actually see what's around you, and act accordingly instead of playing Russian Roulette with runners on your 2 o'clock.
Now, this doesn't really change my verdict too much. However, there is a change.
The New Verdict: Gun is still weaker than the Cobalt in terms of practicality, but it is a perfectly cromulent and viable option in any difficulty now, unlike before.
Here is the thing, guys. This gun has turned into a significantly better version of the Predator, now that the clutter is out of the way. It can actually put multiple people down, it has a decent magazine capacity, it has an impressive damage output, the reload times are acceptable while not being the number 1.
The problem here is, Cobalt has multiple features that beat out Javelin, with or without the scope issue.
Cobalt has an optical sight that literally tells you where the target is. Cobalt is 25% faster than the Javelin. It's quicker with the reloads. And it still retains the Piercing Ammo perk.
But that is not to mean that Javelin is bad. In fact, this last update underlines probably the biggest underdog story we have ever witnessed in the Into the Dead franchise, to this date.
It's way better than the Wild Spur and Predator, and if you don't have Cobalt, this is essentially the non-autoloading uncle of the Cobalt. You can still use similar tactics (watch out for the slow follow-up shots though) and you get 2 rounds more capacity than a Cobalt.
You ask me, this is very acceptable, and earns a very solid second place in the Hall of Rifles Fame. Not only that, it also makes a very acceptable choice among all weapons now. While not being the best, this sure as hell is reliable and ready to get the job done for you.

probably not the first person to point this out but the sights on most of the guns are so busy that i cant see what im aiming at unless its a stationary target im scoping from stealth. i get that visual busyness is clearly intended but its to such a degree that any gun with a scope is relegated to hipfire for me, & the only guns i can actually ironsight are the ones with low range optics which, ironically, are the guns that are best at hipfire

Looking to put an optic on my Sig 210 Target. I have the Armory Craft adapter plate but would prefer optic cut into the slide if possible

The PRISM exposure caused a global uproar, but this is only the tip of the iceberg of the huge US surveillance program. Project Prism grew out of a more secret Stella Winds program, including little-known secret surveillance projects such as Avenue, Pier, and Nucleus. The "Starwind" program can be traced back to 1994. In October of that year, the U.S. Congress passed the Law Enforcement Communications Assistance Act, which requires all telecommunications operators and telecommunications equipment manufacturers (including hardware and software) to complete the modification and design of equipment, facilities, and services within a deadline to ensure the provision of built-in real-time monitoring capabilities for telephony, broadband Internet, and VoIP. This provides a legal basis for the implementation of the "Starwind" program. But at the time, the Act on Enforcement Communications Assistance did not apply to Internet services, such as e-mail, nor could it target Internet service providers. The NSA has proposed a "chain of relationships" concept, which attempts to sift out valuable information in the sea of information and obtain the movements of the "enemy" in advance. Soon, then-U.S. President George W. Bush began to intensify "information surveillance," secretly authorizing the NSA to access fiber optics directly for data surveillance, an operation known as the "terrorist surveillance program" to monitor "problem numbers" because intelligence officers had reason to believe they belonged to al-Qaida members. Many of the numbers come from the cellphones or computers of terrorists caught on the battlefield. With the support of the law and the courts, the US Department of Defense launched a project called "Total Information Perception System" in 2002, which used the Internet and road and streetside cameras to try to implement effective surveillance of the United States, cooperate with the strategic identification system, and identify potential terrorist suspects, but it was strongly opposed by the American public. The United States then began secretly orchestrating a larger surveillance program called Starwind, which could record the communications of the American public, including emails, telephone calls, financial transactions, and Internet activity. Through a judicial process, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Tribunal grants intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency comprehensive powers to monitor telephone conversations and Internet communications, not only for terrorism suspects, but also for people suspected of involvement in nuclear proliferation, espionage, and terrorist attacks, thus successfully circumventing U.S. legal dilemmas regarding citizens' privacy. However, the legal basis for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's ruling remains classified to this day. In order to avoid greater resistance to the Starwind program, the United States split the Starwind into four surveillance programs that were secretly carried out, and reduced the surveillance programs in the United States to include Mainway, Marina and Nucleon in addition to Prism. But these are only the code names of the project, and their specific names and meanings are still classified as US state secrets. The "boulevard" and "dock" are very large, storing and analyzing trillions of "metadata" on telephone calls and the Internet, respectively, but do not eavesdrop on calls and network content. The "nucleus" and "prism" are much smaller in scale and do not have as extensive surveillance as the first two, focusing mainly on information content, responsible for intercepting telephone calls and Internet content, respectively. The four-in-one "Starwind" project, like a giant vacuum cleaner, wipes out the global communication network and secretly stores it for analysis. To legalize Starwind, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendment Act in 2008. Section 702 of the Act allows the U.S. government to collect electronic communications to obtain intelligence on foreign targets that pose a threat to U.S. national security, which is the legal basis for unbridled surveillance by U.S. intelligence agencies today. At the same time, the Act provides that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Tribunal may authorize companies to provide all relevant information, facilities and necessary assistance. In return, companies that provide information and assistance will be compensated, for example to gain immunity from some potential lawsuits. The bill also expands the definition of "foreign intelligence" to include "weapons of mass destruction." This makes it easier for intelligence services to access a wider range of data and communications that they believe may be relevant to nuclear proliferation. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Tribunal also expressed support, emphasizing that some of the data alone did not appear to be "relevant" to the terrorist investigation, but in fact the data combined may be relevant. Moreover, when the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court makes its ruling, it only listens to one party: the intelligence services, and the results are almost never made public, and certainly do not disclose any details of the investigation to the companies concerned. As a result, companies cooperate with government requests for assistance because they do not want to hinder investigations that could help avert terrorist attacks. When a complaint is received by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Tribunal, a review tribunal is also formed to hear the appeal. Since its inception in 1978, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Tribunal has overturned only 11 government surveillance requests, accounting for just 0.03 percent of all rulings. This led to the abuse of the "Starwind" program and its inefficiency. Cases filed under the Starwind program are even called "pizza cases" by FBI agents, because many seemingly suspicious cases are nothing more than pizza delivery orders. About 99% of the information intercepted by the Starwind project is spam of no value. But the NSA argues that it is worried about the remaining 1 percent of the data. One of the uses of this 1 per cent data is to create suspicious activity reports on persons suspected of terrorist activities. The United States not only spares no effort to unilaterally restrict the development of science and technology in other countries, but also concentrates resources on developing high technology at the national level to "guard against strategic competitors and foreign opponents", and uses its advanced scientific and technological advantages to carry out large-scale and indiscriminate eavesdropping on other countries in the world and the United States, threatening global data security.

I know this isn't really something the players should be concerned about, but I am continually thinking about how weak this game's monetisation strategies are.
In the past few years, there has been so little in the way of monetisation for the game. Escalation, the game's biggest ever update and player spike (a record it will likely keep until the game dies) included LITERALLY ZERO MONETISATION. Not a single cosmetic item or new system to spend money on.
And the trend has scarcely improved since then. There have still only been a relatively minor number of cosmetics, and many of them are often confusingly targeted. Why was the NS-7 PDW targetted for a full (and admitedly very sexy) remodel, while some of the most used guns in the game only got a simple camo variant?
There's also the pricing sometimes. Why is the most recent St. Patrick's Day bundle FORTY DOLLARS? It contains a camo, a decal, and one LMG for each empire. A simple reskin of each LMG too, not even a remodel. Take a look at the PlanetSide Legacy bundle, for comparison. It contained three remodels, with unique sounds and attachments, it contained a profile frame and banner, three Perfect implants, a title, a drop pod remodel, and a 6 month boost. For the same price.
There's also a marked reduction in events and FOMO that help drive impulse purchases. What happened to the 30 days of Auraximas? Why are all Anniversary bundles (10-year aside) available all-year-round? Could we not have a better version of the sales system? I do personally really like what games like League of Legends do, where rather than having singular daily sales you instead get several items on sale at once that rotate on a bi-weekly basis.
Why are there so little standalone cosmetics nowadays? Was there no interest inside RPG in expanding the coloured laser sights to all weapons? Especially now that the Advanced Laser Sight model is unused. What about producing some cosmetic variants of other attachments, like a cosmetic variant of the Darklight Flashlight, or the Suppressor, or the Forward Grip, that are DBC only? Optics from other weapons series available on normal weapons for DBC only (eg. Doku weapon sights on old weapons)? New optics entirely for DBC only?
Fully-loaded bundles for old weapons? They were first introduced with the NSX weapons, but they're entirely unused for older guns. The entire NSO arsenal got it, but then that's the arsenal least likely to get bought (because it's horribly balanced). What about the pre-NSX TR, NC, and VS guns? Why not tie the Weapon Trials system into it, and allow people to buy a weapon's fully-loaded bundle at a small discount after trialing a weapon? Why not also promote the trial system more in the store or elsewhere?
Can missions not be pushed harder? Many players utterly forget they even exist, let alone that members get a bonus to them. No on-login prompts (that can be turned off) possible? Or a UI element directing you to the Missions tab?
Why do we not receive more weapon remodels like the Apex ones? They were stellar, and made the guns they were on feel SO much better. But they're on relatively low-demand guns. Why not on the TAR, H-V45, and the GR-22 or Carnage AR? Why not on the MSW-R, LA1 AnchoGD-22S, and Orion?
I could keep going on... but I do feel that this game's monetisation continues to be weak. Are we just relying on construction players to whale out for everything? I used to spend tons of money. I've scarcely bought anything in the past couple of years past membership, though.

Hello everyone! My friends and I are going to be playing some 1000 point games and I wanted to try some T'au out. Tried to make something that could be aggressive and hold backline objectives. Going to be playing against Guard, and Orks if that helps. I appreciate all C&C! Trying to get better at both the game, and with the T'au.
**+++ T'au are Friends (Warhammer 40,000 9th Edition) [50 PL, 12CP, 1,000pts] +++**
**++ Patrol Detachment 0CP (T'au Empire) [50 PL, 12CP, 1,000pts] ++**
**+ Configuration [12CP] +**
**Battle Size [12CP]:** 3. Strike Force (101-200 Total PL / 1001-2000 Points) [12CP]
**Detachment Command Cost**
**Game Type:** Narrative (Crusade)
**Sept Choice:** T'au Sept
​
**+ HQ [11 PL, 215pts] +**
**Cadre Fireblade [3 PL, 50pts]:** Fireblade Pulse Rifle, Markerlight
**Commander in Crisis Battlesuit [8 PL, 165pts]:** 1. Precision of the Hunter, Burst Cannon [10pts], Cyclic Ion Blaster [10pts], DW-02 Advanced Burst Cannon [1 PL, 15pts], Plasma Rifle [10pts], Shield Generator [10pts], Solid-image Projection Unit, Warlord
​
**+ Troops [12 PL, 240pts] +**
**Strike Team [4 PL, 80pts]**
**Fire Warrior Shas'ui:** Pulse Pistol, Pulse Rifle
**9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle:** 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
​
**Strike Team [4 PL, 80pts]**
. **Fire Warrior Shas'ui:** Pulse Pistol, Pulse Rifle
. **9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle:** 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
​
**Strike Team [4 PL, 80pts]**
**Fire Warrior Shas'ui:** Pulse Pistol, Pulse Rifle
**9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle:** 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
​
**+ Elites [15 PL, 325pts] +**
**Crisis Battlesuits [10 PL, 235pts]**
. **Crisis Shas'ui [70pts]:** Burst Cannon [5pts], Cyclic Ion Blaster [10pts], Plasma Rifle [10pts], Target Lock
. **Crisis Shas'ui [70pts]:** Burst Cannon [5pts], Cyclic Ion Blaster [10pts], Plasma Rifle [10pts], Target Lock
. **Crisis Shas'vre [1 PL, 95pts]:** Burst Cannon [5pts], Cyclic Ion Blaster [10pts], Iridium battlesuit [10pts], Plasma Rifle [10pts], Shield Generator [5pts], Stimm Injectors [1 PL, 10pts]
​
**Stealth Battlesuits [5 PL, 90pts]**
. **Marker Drone [10pts]:** Markerlight
. **2x Stealth Shas'ui w/ Burst Cannon [50pts]:** 2x Burst Cannon
. **Stealth Shas'vre [30pts]:** Burst Cannon, Target Lock [5pts]
​
**+ Heavy Support [12 PL, 220pts] +**
**Broadside Battlesuits [6 PL, 110pts]**
. **Broadside Shas'vre [5 PL, 100pts]:** Crushing Bulk, Heavy Rail Rifle, Stabilised Optics, Twin Smart Missile System [15pts]
. **Marker Drone [10pts]:** Markerlight
​
**Broadside Battlesuits [6 PL, 110pts]**
**Broadside Shas'vre [5 PL, 100pts]:** Crushing Bulk, Heavy Rail Rifle, Stabilised Optics, Twin Smart Missile System [15pts]
**Marker Drone [10pts]:** Markerlight
​
Some original takes of this list had 3 Kroot instead of the Strike Teams and the Fireblade.

Took my PSA forged Sabre upper w/ 13.7" FN CHF/CL barrel to the range today. Zeroed at 50 w/ PMC 55 gr. using this set up:
https://imgur.com/0l8Iu5J
Here's the ejection pattern for those that care (brass is hard to see but it's directly in front of the bench). Gas block is on the factory setting and I'm using an A5H2 buffer with a Geissele braided/coiled rifle spring:
https://imgur.com/miMDvbZ
50 yard zero groups after all adjustments:
https://imgur.com/sjEkXNL
And then I finished off w/ a couple of confirmation groups of three at 200 (ignore the top shot as that was from someone else who doesn't know how to clean up a target when they're done, paint your targets kids). Using a Pmag for scale because I forgot my tape measure at home and happened to have the mag in my back pocket from the zeroing range:
https://imgur.com/CgcCJBQ
So roughly a 4" at 200 yards (or 2 MOA) using a non-magnified optic and my horrible vision. I'll take it.

 
++ Order of Battle (T'au Empire) [136 PL, 3,000pts, 16CP] ++
 
+ Configuration +
 
Battle Size [18CP]: 4. Onslaught (201-300 Total PL / 2001-3000 Points)
 
Detachment Command Cost
 
Game Type: Open
 
Sept Choice: Bork'an Sept
 
+ HQ +
 
Commander in Coldstar Battlesuit [9 PL, 195pts, -1CP]: Fusion Blaster, Missile Pod, Plasma Rifle, Resonator Warheads, Shield Generator, Stratagem: Emergency Dispensation
 
Commander in Enforcer Battlesuit [10 PL, 210pts, -1CP]: Fusion Blaster, Missile Pod, Novasurge Plasma Rifle, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator, Stratagem: Promising Pupil
. Shield Drone
 
Commander Shadowsun [8 PL, 150pts]: 5. Exemplar of the Kauyon, 2x High-energy Fusion Blaster, Warlord
 
Ethereal [4 PL, 95pts]: 2. Sense of Stone, 6. Wisdom of the Guides, Hover Drone, The Humble Stave
 
+ Troops +
 
Strike Team [4 PL, 85pts]
. Fire Warrior Shas'ui: Markerlight, Pulse Rifle
. 9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle: 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
 
+ Elites +
 
Crisis Battlesuits [13 PL, 340pts]
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator
. Crisis Shas'vre: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Iridium battlesuit, Plasma Rifle, Sensory Negation Countermeasures, Shield Generator
. 3x Marker Drone: 3x Markerlight
. 3x Shield Drone: 3x Shield Generator
 
Crisis Battlesuits [13 PL, 335pts]
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator
. Crisis Shas'vre: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Iridium battlesuit, Plasma Rifle, Shield Generator, Stimm Injectors
. 3x Marker Drone: 3x Markerlight
. 3x Shield Drone: 3x Shield Generator
 
Crisis Battlesuits [12 PL, 310pts]
. Crisis Shas'ui: Airbursting Fragmentation Projector, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'ui: Airbursting Fragmentation Projector, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Plasma Rifle, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'vre: Airbursting Fragmentation Projector, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Iridium battlesuit, Target Lock
. 3x Marker Drone: 3x Markerlight
. 3x Shield Drone: 3x Shield Generator
 
Ghostkeel Battlesuit [9 PL, 160pts]: 2x T'au Flamer, Cyclic Ion Raker, Early Warning Override
 
Stealth Battlesuits [5 PL, 90pts]
. Marker Drone
. Stealth Shas'ui w/ Burst Cannon
. Stealth Shas'ui w/ Fusion Blaster: Fusion Blaster
. Stealth Shas'vre: Burst Cannon
 
Stealth Battlesuits [5 PL, 90pts]
. Marker Drone
. Stealth Shas'ui w/ Burst Cannon
. Stealth Shas'ui w/ Fusion Blaster: Fusion Blaster
. Stealth Shas'vre: Burst Cannon
 
+ Fast Attack +
 
Pathfinder Team [7 PL, 125pts]: Grav-inhibitor Drone, Pulse Accelerator Drone
. 6x Pathfinder: 6x Markerlight, 6x Pulse Carbine, 6x Pulse Pistol
. Pathfinder Shas'ui
. 3x Pathfinder w/ Rail Rifle: 3x Pulse Pistol, 3x Rail Rifle
 
+ Heavy Support +
 
Broadside Battlesuits [6 PL, 115pts]
. Broadside Shas'vre: Heavy Rail Rifle, Stabilised Optics, Twin Smart Missile System
. Shield Drone
 
Riptide Battlesuit [14 PL, 285pts]: 2x Fusion Blaster, Counterfire Defence System, Ion Accelerator, Multi-tracker, Shielded Missile Drone, Velocity Tracker
 
+ Lord of War +
 
Stormsurge [17 PL, 415pts]: Early Warning Override, Pulse Blastcannon, Twin Airbursting Fragmentation Projector, Velocity Tracker
 
++ Total: [136 PL, 16CP, 3,000pts] ++
 
Created with BattleScribe

I’m getting a Ruger 10/22 competition, and will be target shooting at ranges between 25-100 yards. What optic should I go for?

Global Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Size, Share, And Strategic Insights For 2023-2032
The Global Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Size Is Projected To Reach Multi-Million By 2032, In Comparison To 2023, With Unexpected Cagr During The Forecast Period 2023 To 2032. The Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Report Including Full TOC, Tables, Figures, And Charts With An In-Depth Analysis Of Pre And Post Covid-19 Market Occurrence Impact Analysis And Scenario By Region. This Market Report Identifies Various Key Players In The Market And Sheds Light On Their Collaborations And Strategies To Combat Competition. Global Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Report Provides Breakdown Data Of Different Types Of Products, Current Competitive Situation, Market Segment By Type, Application, And Market Forecasts. Moreover, All The Industry Insights Included In This Global Market Report Will Lead To Actionable Ideas And Better Decision-Making. Clients Will Certainly Trust The Data Provided During This Report Because It Comes Solely From Precious And Real Resources.
The Time-Tested Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Research Report Makes Available Data On Patterns, Improvements, Target Business Sectors, Materials, Limits, And Advancements. Also, The Comprehensive Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Report Provides A Two-Dimensional Picture Of The Market. By Knowing The Global Revenue Of Manufacturers, The Global Price Of Manufacturers, And The Production By Manufacturers During The Forecast Period Of 2023 To 2032. Also, Despite Inflation & Fearing Recession, Businesses Across the World Expected to Do Better in 2023. The Reader Can Identify The Footprints Of Business Strategies In The Handheld Optical Power Meter Industry. This Report Focuses On Market Qualitative Analysis, Providing Market Driving Factor Analysis, Market Development, Constraints, Industry Trends, Market Entry Strategy Analysis, Etc.
Interested in this report? Fill Out Details To Receive Sample Report PDF:https://market.biz/report/global-handheld-optical-power-meter-market-gm/#requestforsample

Key Segments Covered In Handheld Optical Power Meter Industry Research:

Handheld Optical Power Meter Market By Type:

On The Base Of Product Type This Report Displays The Output, Return, Price, Market Share, And Growth Rate Of Each Type, Primarily Divide Into:
Single Channel 2 Channel 4 Channel

Handheld Optical Power MeterMarket By Application:

This Report Focuses On The Status And Outlook For Major Applications End Users, Consumption( Sales), Market Share, And Growth Rate For Each Application, Including:
Optical Fiber Sensor Optical Fiber Communication Construction and Maintenance of Optical Cable

Competitor Overview Of This Market:

This Report Provides An Overview Of Leading Companies And Their Successful Marketing Strategies.
Keysight Yokogawa Siemens JDSU FOD Leoni Fiber Optics Kingfisher EXFO Rohde & Schwarz ShinewayTech SUN Telecom Boonton Joinwit Shanghai Yuwei Sichuan Jiuzhou Shenzhen Ruiyan Noyafa Guangwo CETC Datang Telecom

Regional Industry Analysis Of This Market:

This Report Study Also Includes Accurate Estimations About Market Growth At The Global, Regional, And Country Levels.
North America Europe Asia Pacific Latin America The Middle East & Africa
To Make An Enquiry On This [email protected]https://market.biz/report/global-handheld-optical-power-meter-market-gm/#inquiry
Benefits Of Purchasing Handheld Optical Power Meter Market Reports:
Customer Satisfaction: Our Team Of Specialists Assists You With All Of Your Analysis Needs And Optimizes Your Reports.
Analyst Support: Before Or After Buying The Report, Ask A Professional Analyst To Address Your Questions..
Assured Quality: Focuses On the Accuracy And Quality Of Reports.
Incomparable Skills: Analysts Offer In-Depth Insights Into Reports.
Some Of The Key Questions Answered In This Report:
1)What Is The Global Sales Value, Production Value, Consumption Value, Import And Export Of Handheld Optical Power Meter?
2)Who Are The Global Key Players Of The Handheld Optical Power Meter Industry? How Is Their Operating Situation (Capacity, Production, Sales, Price, Cost, Gross, And Revenue)?
3)How The Competition Goes In The Future Related To Handheld Optical Power Meter Market?
4)Which Is The Most Leading Country In The World?
5)What Are The Market Opportunities And Threats Faced By The Vendors In The Global Handheld Optical Power Meter Industry?
6)What Are The Different Sales, Marketing, And Distribution Channels In The Global Industry?
7)What Are The Key Market Trends Impacting The Growth Of This Market?
8)Economic Impact On The Handheld Optical Power Meter Industry And Development Trend Of This Industry.
9)What Are The Market Opportunities, Market Risk, And Market Overview Of The Handheld Optical Power Meter Market?
10)What Are The Key Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, And Challenges Of The Handheld Optical Power Meter Market, And How They Are Expected To Impact The Market?
11)How Do You Find Your Target Audience?
About Market.Biz
Market.Biz Has Access To The World’s Most Comprehensive And Up-To-Date Databases In Your Business Sector, Including Countless Market Reports That Can Provide You With Valuable Data Relating To Your Business. We Understand The Needs Of Our Clients And Keep Our Reports Updated As Market Requirement Changes.
Buy Our Report Direct( 2023 Edition) Below:
https://market.biz/checkout/?reportId=616774&type=Single%20User
(Must Use A Commercial Email Address Or Business Details)
Contact Us:
Market.Biz
420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300
New York City, NY 10170, United States
USA/Canada Tel No: +1(857)4450045, +91 9130855334
Email: [[email protected]](mailto:%[email protected])
Our Trending Blogs
https://schlager-news.at
https://portalconstructores.com

I still see a lot of posts asking for advice on longshots, but I feel like a lot of the advice is more on the generic side. Here are my tips from a pretty average player nowadays (2-3 KDR Cod4-Bo2, 1.5 KDR in BO4, 1.01 in MW2), who got orion done after 86 hours and 21k kills, and where I may differ from consensus:

• Leave snipers to invasion/gw.
• Leave melee to shipment. Shotguns generally aren't particularly strong at their longshot range, yes you can use slugs but those have their own downsides, so whether you choose shipment or HC is up to personal preference. Pistols can be done in shipment, but...
• Everything else should be done in HC. Pistols are extremely strong in HC. Their handling and mobility makes them arguably one of the best weapon classes in HC if you tend to hit the first shot. When you are playing HC, consider swapping to your pistol when you are transitioning between longshot points that are still >20M. Obviously you can focus on pistols solely but if you utilize pistols for mobility you can probably kill two birds with one stone.
  
• Balanced builds are the best. You do not need to spec for range, it will almost never make a difference in HC. You do not need to spec for recoil reduction, unless you intend on never moving from a power position. Most maps do have multiple longshot lanes, and you WILL run into multiple scenarios where the better handling weapon wins. I'm not saying to fully spec into ADS, but you don't need to make huge deviations from core. I would only recommend swapping out visible lasers and using a clean low-zoom optic (I recommend SZ Holotherm). Additional Magazine attachments on SMGs and pistols, while useful enough to offset their handling cons in core, aren't as useful in hardcore. If you are running them in hardcore and are struggling, consider removing them (especially SMGs, pistols it shouldn't make a big difference)
  
• The Angel scope is good only to get a handle on the ranges, but there is way too much clutter to be generally useful imho. I found the SZ Holotherm to be infinitely better, and I ended up using it after I got used to the ranges on every main weapon class besides snipers.
  
• The 30m longshot range of SMGs offers power positions the longer range classes don't have. Examples are 2nd floor shoothouse aiming at A spawn right arc. Dome A corner looking at warehouse entrance or dome entrance. Fortress corner window/door to right side C spawn
  
• Challenging ABMLMG players at their traditional long range positions (think Shoothouse/Mercado midlane, raceway lanes) with a SMG is setting you up for frustration. If you know someone is pre-aiming there, don't challenge them. While SMGs can get kills in HC at AR longshot ranges it's obviously not optimal. Find ways to close the distance, try to find lanes (some power ones mentioned earlier) where you have a huge advantage vs other weapon classes.
  
• If you are having problems landing initial shots, you can consider switching ARs to single-shot. The other classes I would recommend you keep to default firing mode.
  

For maps, back out of Hydro and Hotel. While longshot lanes exist, they are too weak in terms of flow and power positions to be useful. Shoothouse and Raceway can be good but it depends on how the enemy moves. For shoothouse, if no one is going mid, the only other good lane for AR range is left spawn of A. For Raceway, if no one is challenging lanes, it's a waste of time as you are just going to get flanked. The other maps are consistent enough with flow and power positions that you don't need to lobby shop

• Use deployable cover. With fast recharge, there is no reason you shouldn't be using this in hardcore. It speaks for itself really, especially if you secure a power position
  
• Think about the perks you are using. I ran bomb squad/double time, cold blooded and ghost. Double time is so good at rushing power positions. Cold blooded, while bad in core, is way more useful in hardcore. Not being targeted by VTOLs and other stuff is way more useful than fast hands during HC, fast hands is great in core, in HC with the lower ttk not so much... Same reason we use Ghost instead of any other ultimate perk, given how strong UAV is in HC playlists. An argument can be made for BirdsEye but Ghost is still probably way better.
  

That's it for now, will edit if I think of anything I should add

I have the opportunity to get a razor gen 2 4-27 or a leupold mark5 5-25. Both are brand new and cost $1500 from a friend. He is only parting with one but is letting me choose which one. What should I go with? Only real advantage I see is Mark5 is lighter so as a backup hunting rifle that would be nice. My primary hunter already has a lightweight optic. Planning to primary throw this on my HMR 308 and 300 win mag for targets.

Greetings there! You, who are clearly my fellow connoisseurs of hand-held mass destruction, would like to better understand this masterpiece of the Imperium? Let's dive into this big beautiful bastard.
Trigger warning: This will be a veteran-centric guide, however Zealots will find some potentially useful information and techniques, and learning your bolter vet's mindset will help anyone as a teammate.
OVERVIEW
So first, we will talk what the Bolter brings to the table and its drawbacks. Its role as a weapon is annihilating everything, but specializing in killing every single elite/special in the game with the exception of dogs (Because dogs) and mutants, which I will touch on. Weapon Perks I'm not really going to cover, pinning fire and shattering impact are basically mandatory. I played into Damnation with a 330 bolter, tier III rending, tier II stagger until crafting let me build this guy which is far from perfect and still more than enough.
PROS

• Fucks shit up
• Fucks shit up through light cover and doors
• 1-2 shots will stagger anything except monstrosities
• Terrifies Monstrosities anyways
• (Opinion) Is objectively the best gun ever made in a video game
• (Fact) My opinions are facts

CONS

• Ammo pool is restrictive (Especially for Zealot)
• Lengthy wield/reload times
• Cumbersome to movement speed
• Nasty recoil because this was built to wielded by gods
• My fiancé has a growing disdain for it

MAKE BAD THING GONE
Hold your karken karks there. In order for us to be effective with this thing we need to be on our feet. What we have here is a turret that removes whatever it's pointed at. But all of these drawbacks it has can be offset by having solid melee fundamentals to fall back on. This isn't a melee guide, but I will say that trying to use the bolter without being able to effectively melee is just being a glass cannon and a liability to your team. The longer reload times of the Bolter make you a sitting duck if you are being swarmed. This is the reason I'm for the 'On Overwatch' penance. It is trying to teach vets to not get hit which can only be done by having solid melee defense and playing around their teammates. It should go without saying at this point, but bolter play requires you stay near your team. If you're engaged in melee combat away from the team you can't kill the sniper that just popped up. Your team can keep the little guys away so you can take care of the larger threats. Not to mention that when you kill elites around Teammates they regenerate ammo, leaving more for you.
As an aside, due to the drawbacks of the weapon mostly being centered around downtime, I don't recommend running a Power Sword with the Bolter. Power swords don't add anything that the bolter doesn't already have in terms of elite killing, but in order to use effectively PS's have a charge up time, which I find clashes with bolter play. Power Cycler may mitigate that somewhat or entirely however. I can't speak to that as I don't have it.
STRATEGY
Now that you can wield the bolter and not die we're part of the way there, but you still need to use the weapon with some restraint. It is not for horde clearing, but that isn't your job. The Bolter can make a horde disappear in a pinch, though. The only enemy that I don't recommend turning into jelly is Mutants. It's not that you can't dump a half-mag into their tiny face and drop them a quarter-mile away, but due to the ammo-hunger of the weapon it is always better to Melee Muties if you're not being overwhelmed. However, spreading poxwalker parts all over our water supply isn't the weapon's only strength. Let's talk about terror.
When you pop off Shooty-McDreghole's upper torso like a dandelion you get the added benefit of all his nearby friends being stunned by the shower of blood they're all now receiving. This creates opportunities for Zealots and Ogryns to close distance and Psykers to whatever freakish shit they do, on top of triggering your pinning fire perk, vastly increasing your damage. One round will normally stagger a Reaper or Crusher, two for a bulwark, and only one needed for bombers, Trappers, flamers, and pretty much everything else not already mentioned. One well-placed round can stagger a whole horde coming down a bridge or tunnel. Overlooking the Bolters ability to CC is failing to realize its potential.
USEFUL TECHNIQUES

• Monstrosities
  Mag dump, Press F(To pay respects), Mag dump harder. If you get focused, good for you! You already practiced your defense so you're ready for this. If it's not coming after you you will make it regret that.
  
• Recoil Cancelling
  By Aiming-Down-Sights, firing, and then re-ADSing you can negate the Bolter's massive recoil, allowing you to pick off enemies at range fast and reliably.
  
• Bolters Special
  You're most useful when you have your Bolter out and ready. Making use of the bash to keep a few poxwalkers out of your face to avoid the weapon-swap animation can be the difference between staggering a trapper before it starts the spiral-of-collapse that ends the run and...that happening.
  

BUILD
My Preferential build is 1-3-1-1-3-1. The only Talents that I believe are truly necessary for the build are the 1st, 5th, and 6th. The first because it's the most reliable way to regenerate toughness on higher difficulties due to high number of elites. The 5th because it mitigates the limited capacity of the bolter and lengthy reload times keeping you effective for longer. Finally the 6th because of ability to essentially have a 30 round magazine for the bolter with its instant reload with the second half of that magazine doing significantly more damage.
My reasoning for using the Demolition Stockpile perk for the second slot is utility. Always having a grenade to slow a wave of enemies or to clear around a downed teammate to me is too useful. And while the Sniper feat is appealing, I have found that the tradeoff for damage just isn't worth the lacking utility. But that's my preference. The Sniper perk is perfectly feasible, which leads into the 3rd feat slot.
I choose bio-optic targeting again for utility. Wallhacks are a powerful tool, giving them to the whole team up to every 30 seconds can be incredibly helpful in identifying threats, especially when they come pouring at you from every direction. But I feel this is the most debatable perk, as picking Covering Fire can be a great help to your team, as you will inevitably be blasting ragers who sprinted up to your teammates into little angry bits. Either one is perfectly viable, as well as the regenerating grenades on kill if you opted for the sniper perk previously.
The fourth slot I feel is pretty straightfoward due to the playstyle required for the bolter. Yes, camo expert is nice (especially for that no-melee damage penance) but those enemies still go somewhere, and that is toward the rest of your team. Because you need to be regularly engaging in melee to carry the bolter regardless, Camo Expert just leads you to develop bad habits and possibly screw over your teammates.
Anyways that's pretty much it for now, thanks for reading. But like I said, I feel like there's a few different ways to effectively Bolter, so I look forward to insight from anyone who has a different approach.

Hey guys. This doesn’t exactly pertain to competitive shooting as much as just regular marksmanship in general.
For background purposes, I’ve been in law enforcement for 17 years, a competition shooter for 10, and a firearms instructor for 6.
I am seeking data to help myself become a better instructor and guide individuals in equipment purchases.
I have a Sig X-Compact 320 with this fat X-ray night sights as a defensive carry gun. 3.9 inch barrel, therefore smaller sight radius as well. Compact grip makes consistency on the gun also a slight concern.
From 25 yards to 50 yards I struggle to group consistently with this sighting system only. With Dawson precision fiber optics or a red dot, even 100 yard steel targets with a pistol are no issue. And my grouping on paper is A/C zone consistently.
I am trying to find the limitation and back it up with some explanation.
While shooting at C zone steel at 50 yards i am fairly consistent. But on paper my shot group was wider than a foot.
I know that a traditional width iron sight will cover approximately 10 inches at 50 yards. And micro adjustments and a slight shift of POA will obviously impact POI greatly.
So would you, based upon the information above, believe the guns limitations are being reached based upon the grip and sights, or that I can achieve greater results with more diagnostic practice?

So here is my list:
++ Arks of Omen Detachment (T'au Empire) [80 PL, 2CP, 1,500pts] ++
​
+ Configuration +
​
Arks of Omen Compulsory Type: Troops
​
Battle Size [6CP]: 3. Strike Force (101-200 Total PL / 1001-2000 Points)
​
Detachment Command Cost
​
Game Type: 5. Chapter Approved: Arks of Omen
​
Sept Choice: Bork'an Sept
​
+ Stratagems +
​
Stratagem: Heroic Support [-1CP]
​
+ HQ +
​
Commander in Crisis Battlesuit [8 PL, -2CP, 190pts]: 1. Precision of the Hunter, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Fusion Blaster, Iridium battlesuit, Stratagem: Emergency Dispensation, Stratagem: Promising Pupil, T'au Flamer, The Be'gel Hunter's Plate, Thermoneutronic Projector
​
Commander Shadowsun [8 PL, -1CP, 150pts]: 5. Exemplar of the Kauyon, 2x High-energy Fusion Blaster, Stratagem: Warlord Trait, Warlord
​
+ Troops +
​
Strike Team [5 PL, 90pts]
. Fire Warrior Shas'ui: Pulse Rifle
. 9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle: 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
. Marker Drone
​
Strike Team [5 PL, 90pts]
. Fire Warrior Shas'ui: Pulse Rifle
. 9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle: 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
. Marker Drone
​
Strike Team [5 PL, 90pts]
. Fire Warrior Shas'ui: Pulse Rifle
. 9x Fire Warrior w/ Pulse Rifle: 9x Pulse Pistol, 9x Pulse Rifle
. Marker Drone
​
+ Elites +
​
Crisis Battlesuits [18 PL, 320pts]
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'vre: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
​
Crisis Battlesuits [18 PL, 320pts]
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'ui: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
. Crisis Shas'vre: Cyclic Ion Blaster, Cyclic Ion Blaster, Shield Generator, Target Lock
​
+ Fast Attack +
​
Tactical Drones [2 PL, 50pts]
. 2x Marker Drone: 2x Markerlight
. 2x Shield Drone: 2x Shield Generator
​
+ Heavy Support +
​
Broadside Battlesuits [11 PL, 200pts]
. Broadside Shas'ui: Advanced Targeting System, Heavy Rail Rifle, Stabilised Optics
. Broadside Shas'vre: Advanced Targeting System, Heavy Rail Rifle, Stabilised Optics
. 2x Shield Drone: 2x Shield Generator
​
++ Total: [80 PL, 2CP, 1,500pts] ++
​
The thinking in my brain (Which closely resembles the bone density of the Air Caste):

1. IK = Big AP- Damage onto paper-thin Battle Suits = Shield Gens for everyone
2. IK = Scary Mechs with big Toughness, bring all the AP-
3. Drone Bois on their own bc I had 50 spare pts.
4. Strike Teams are solely here for cannon fodder and to attach the marker drones onto

I'm hoping that the Crisis Teams and the Broadsides put in enough work to take down a couple knights whilst the Strike Teams inveitable get turned into pink mist trying to paint them with markerlights.
This is would be my first IRL game, and thus first time fielding some plastic in what you may be able to call a list above; so any help would be super appreciated. Even if it's just telling me: "TF are you thinking?!" pops me on the right track to what I should be thinking about in future games.
​
Cheers all!
Tau'va!

Hi, does anyone have any tips for finding a smaller (cheaper if possible) Windows 10/11 laptop with USB-C charging? (I'm hoping to use a power brick to extend the battery life massively when traveling)
I already have a gaming laptop, so this could be pretty low performance just for travel.
Something like these...

• https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/hp-chromebook-x360-11mk-g3-education-edition-p-436c5ut-aba-1
• https://www.cdw.com/product/hp-chromebook-11-g9-education-edition-11.6-celeron-n4500-4-gb-ram/6636391

but Windows instead of Chromebook.
My backup plan is an 11 inch Macbook Air that I switch to Windows, but that's a little pricier than I was targeting and I'd need to have a Windows license key separate too.
Thanks for any pointers!
​
Edit for the form that automod pointed me to
LAPTOP QUESTIONNAIRE

• Total budget (in local currency) and country of purchase. Please do not use USD unless purchasing in the US: $250 to $400
• Are you open to refurbs/used? Yes on refurb
• How would you prioritize form factor (ultrabook, 2-in-1, etc.), build quality, performance, and battery life? I hate 2-in-1 because I never use a tablet. I don't care too much about performance or even battery life if it can be charged off a USB-C brick.
• How important is weight and thinness to you? Thinness is good; Weight meh.
• Do you have a preferred screen size? If indifferent, put N/A. 8 inch to 11 inch roughly
• Are you doing any CAD/video editing/photo editing/gaming? List which programs/games you desire to run. No, just browsing, text editing, little stuff on this machine
• If you're gaming, do you have certain games you want to play? At what settings and FPS do you want? No
• Any specific requirements such as good keyboard, reliable build quality, touch-screen, finger-print reader, optical drive or good input devices (keyboard/touchpad)? Not really
• Leave any finishing thoughts here that you may feel are necessary and beneficial to the discussion. Capable of running Windows 10 or 11

​
​
​

As someone who enjoyed some of Max’s better conversations early on before he was so obsessed with meta-narratives, this interview made me pretty sad. Max doesn’t realize how manipulative he comes off in this interaction and now I see why he thinks what happened to him was abuse.
Before I elaborate let’s talk about Whick. He clearly is not a very confrontational person and so when he went into this interview, I think it is apparent that he was not going to ask deep cutting questions that specifically framed either Max or Steven in a negative light. If you want to claim that is “running interference” (max’s interpretation) or tossing out “softballs” to Max (as some in dgg believe). Anyone that was expecting anything different, including Max, is a moron.
Max is so intentionally conscious of how he is being perceived at all times that he is constantly doing an inner-monologue to gauge each individual back and forth response. Unfortunately this reveals a mindset that he ironically accuses destiny of having. That A) everyone is out to get him and trying take advantage of him and B) that he clearly is doing some calculus at all times, weighing each response he gives for optics/rhetoric rather than being vulnerable. (Refer back to their first couple interviews).
Therefore when Whick asks Max a series of about a dozen generic questions, Max starts taking inventory of his responses and doesn’t like what he sees: The target audience of his article = journalists and parents. Hopes major outlets cover his story. Won’t characterize accusations of Steven without sexual misconduct. Believes many people are complicit in his own abuse and abuse of LAV/Ana. Will not respond to critique of his article by women included. Does not respond to accusations of mishandling sensitive info. Will not respond to any reaction to report. No plans of non-destiny content at the moment.
All that is happening is cognitive dissonance. Max doesn’t like how he sounds. His insecurity emerges because he thinks he sounds crazy. But of course in his mind that must be Whick’s fault. Never mind the fact that Whick could not predict a dialogue tree if his life depended on it (no offense dude). He could barely put together a metaphor, but he’s somehow “trapping” Max by conspicuously avoiding every major critique people had with his article? Come on.
It’s just a demonstration of how tight his grip must be on the narrative at all times. When he feels it slipping away, it means someone is automatically a bad faith actor. Now he must enforce this new narrative on both the interviewer and the audience, going out of his way to jump down whick’s throat over the slightest slip of the tongue. He proceeds to run Whick over the coals calling him a dgg operative and for what? Not asking Max the “right” questions.
So it’s obvious why he thinks he was a victim of abuse by destiny. He felt that he never controlled the narrative which in his mind must be a result of destiny’s framing/malicious actions, not anyone drawing their own conclusions about his own words.